Knowledge, attitudes and evidence-based practices of physical therapy professors from a university of Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20453/rhr.v4i2.4159Abstract
Objective: To describe the knowledge, attitudes and evidence-based practices of the physical therapy professors from a university in Peru. Material and methods: Observational, descriptive and transversal study. The instrument used was the questionnaire designed by Jette et al., modified and validated by Conislla et al. Results: Participated in the study 56 therapy professors, 46 of them answered and returned the questionnaire. The majority was familiar with bibliographical search engines (82.7%). 95.7% reported interest in learning or improving their skills necessary to incorporate EBP into their daily work. In a typical month, 69.5% read from 5 to fewer articles and 69.6% used the scientific literature for making decision 2-10 times. The most important barrier was insufficient time (56.5%). Conclusions: physical therapy professors reported knowledge in fundamentals of EBP and medical search systems. In addition, they are interested in learning or improving their skills; however, they recognized the need to increase the use of evidence in their habitual practice.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles published in the Revista Herediana de Rehabilitación are under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 International license.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons License, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work, and to the first publication in this magazine.
Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version published in this journal, provided they clearly indicate that the work was published in this journal.
The authors can file in the repository of their institution:
The research work or thesis of degree from which the published article derives.
The pre-print version: the version prior to peer review.
The Post-print version: final version after peer review.
The definitive version or final version created by the publisher for publication.