Clinical and urodynamic characteristics of males with underactive bladder and bladder outlet obstruction

Authors

  • Raúl Pastor Medina Ninacóndor Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2461-9716
  • Weymar Melgarejo Zevallos Servicio de Urología General y Oncológica, Hospital Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.
  • Patricia Medina Ninacondor Medina Ninacondor Servicio de Urología General y Oncológica, Hospital Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú
  • Claudia Melgarejo Anamaría Servicio de Urología General y Oncológica, Hospital Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú
  • Leandro Huayanay Falconi Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
  • César Loza-Munarriz Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4545-9969
  • Emma Cadenillas Coronel Servicios de Urología y Reumatología, Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza, Lima, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v35i4.5273

Keywords:

Underactive Urinary Bladder, urodynamics, Lower urinary tract symptoms

Abstract

Objective: To describe clinical and urodynamic features in males with bladder underactive (DU) and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, and exploratory case series among males with lower urinary tract symptoms. Group 1 were patients without BOO or unequivocal in the International Continence Society (ICS) nomogram but with DU diagnosis in the Scäafer’a nomogram. Group 2, patients with BOO in the ICS nomogram. A logistic regression model was conducted to identify the predictive variables of DU. Results: 95 patients were included, 36 with DU in group 1 and 59 with BOO in group 2. There was no difference in age and frequency of symptoms between groups. Age ≥ 56 years correlated with absence of DU [OR: 0.03 (0.01 – 0.26); p = 0.001], while DM [OR: 4.84 (1.21 – 19.34); p = 0.025] and DHIC [OR: 24.093 (6.66 – 87.10); p = 0.025] correlated with DU. Urodynamic variables that correlated with DU were WF ≤ 7 [OR: 23.10 (5.52 -96.67); p = 0.001] and BCI ≤ 99 [OR: 6.93 (1.92 – 24.90); p = 0.003]. Conclusions: Urodynamic variables, WF ≤ 7 and BCI ≤ 99, best correlated with DU.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Raúl Pastor Medina Ninacóndor , Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

       

Weymar Melgarejo Zevallos, Servicio de Urología General y Oncológica, Hospital Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

  

Patricia Medina Ninacondor Medina Ninacondor, Servicio de Urología General y Oncológica, Hospital Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú

  

Claudia Melgarejo Anamaría, Servicio de Urología General y Oncológica, Hospital Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú

       

Leandro Huayanay Falconi, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.

      

     

César Loza-Munarriz , Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.

     

Emma Cadenillas Coronel, Servicios de Urología y Reumatología, Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza, Lima, Perú

     

References

Medina R. Características clínicas y urodinámicas del detrusor hipoactivo y de la obstrucción a la salida de la vejiga. Tesis de maestría. Lima, Perú. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. 2024. Disponible en: https://repositorio.upch.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12866/14901

D'Ancona C, Haylen B, Oelke M, et al. The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):433-477. doi: 10.1002/nau.23897. Epub 2019 Jan 25.

Ko KJ, Lee CU, Lee KS. Clinical implications of underactive bladder. Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Dec;58(Suppl 2):S75-S81. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.S2.S75. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

Chapple CR, Osman NI, Birder L, et al. The underactive bladder: a new clinical concept? Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):351-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.030.

Osman NI, Chapple CR, Abrams P, et al. Detrusor underactivity and the underactive bladder: a new clinical entity? A review of current terminology, definitions, epidemiology, aetiology, and diagnosis. Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):389-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.015.

Gani J, Hennessey D. The underactive bladder: diagnosis and surgical treatment options. Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jul;6(Suppl 2):S186-S195. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.07.

Wang J, Ren L, Liu X, Liu J, Ling Q. Underactive bladder and detrusor underactivity: new advances and prospectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(21):15517 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115517

Osman N, Mangera A, Hillary C, Inman R, Chapple C. The underactive bladder: detection and diagnosis. F1000Res. 2016 Jan 25; 5:F1000 Faculty Rev-102. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7344.1.

Taylor JA 3rd, Kuchel GA. Detrusor underactivity: Clinical features and pathogenesis of an underdiagnosed geriatric condition. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Dec;54(12):1920-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00917.x.

Aldamanhori R, Osman NI, Chapple CR. Underactive bladder: Pathophysiology and clinical significance. Asian J Urol. 2018; 5:17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.02.003

Aizawa N, Igawa Y. Pathophysiology of the underactive bladder. Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Dec;58(Suppl 2):S82-S89. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.S2.S82.

Vale L, Jesus F, Marcelissen T, et al. Pathophysiological mechanisms in detrusor underactivity: Novel experimental findings. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019; 11:92-98. doi: 10.1111/luts.12257

Osman NI, Chapple CR. Contemporary concepts in the aetiopathogenesis of detrusor underactivity. Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Nov;11(11):639-48. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.286.

Santos-Pereira M, Charrua A. Understanding underactive bladder: a review of the contemporary literature. Porto Biomed J. 2020 Jul 17;5(4):e070. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000070.

Nitti VW. Pressure flow urodynamic studies: the gold standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction. Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S14-21.

Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261-74. doi: 10.1002/nau.10066.

Gammie A, Kitney D, Drake M, et al. The calculation and comparison of the Detrusor Contractility Parameter and Watts Factor. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Nov;37(8):2745-2752. doi: 10.1002/nau.23745.

Kalil J, D’Ancona CAL. Detrusor underactivity versus bladder outlet obstruction clinical and urodynamic factors. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):419-424. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0402.

Encarnación E, Espinoza D, Romero M, Medina R, Loza C. Características clínicas y urodinámicas del detrusor hipoactivo en mujeres. Rev Méd Hered. 2023; 34:193-201. doi: 10.20453/rmh.v34i4.5142

Ryles HT, Sansone SA, Levin PJ, Andy UU, Harvie HS, Arya LA. Is Nocturia Associated With Detrusor Underactivity? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Sep 1;27(9):e639-e644. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001035.

Drake MJ, Williams J, Bijos DA. Voiding dysfunction due to detrusor underactivity: an overview. Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Aug;11(8):454-64. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.156.

Majima T, Matsukawa Y, Funahashi Y, Takai S, Kato M, Yamamoto T, Gotoh M. Urodynamic analysis of the impact of diabetes mellitus on bladder function. Int J Urol. 2019 Jun;26(6):618-622. doi: 10.1111/iju.13935.

Liu S, Chan L, Tse V. Clinical outcome in male patients with detrusor overactivity with impaired contractility. Int Neurourol J. 2014 Sep;18(3):133-7. doi: 10.5213/inj.2014.18.3.133.

Arriaga HR, Vela A. Retención Urinaria. Rev Guatem Uro. 30 de junio de 2017; 3(1):3-8. doi: 10.54212/27068048.v3i1.95

Abrams P. Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int. 1999 Jul;84(1):14-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00121.x.

Sekido N. Bladder contractility and urethral resistance relation: what does a pressure flow study tell us? Int J Urol. 2012 Mar;19(3):216-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02947.x.

Gammie A, Kitney D, Drake M, et al. The calculation and comparison of the Detrusor Contractility Parameter and Watts Factor. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Nov;37(8):2745-2752. doi: 10.1002/nau.23745.

Lecamwasam HS, Yalla SV, Cravalho EG, Sullivan MP. The maximum watts factor as a measure of detrusor contractility independent of outlet resistance. Neurourol Urodyn. 1998;17(6):621-35. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1998)17:6<621::aid-nau6>3.0.co;2-4.

Liu D, Chen M, Han X, Li Y. Comparative study of the maximum Watts factor and Schafer contractility grade, bladder contractility index in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(44):e13101. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013101.

Oelke M, Rademakers KL, van Koeveringe GA. Detrusor contraction power parameters (BCI and W max) rise with increasing bladder outlet obstruction grade in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: results from a urodynamic database analysis. World J Urol. 2014 Oct;32(5):1177-83. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1358-6.

Rosier PFWM, Gammie A, Valdevenito JP, et al. ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting. Part 2: Analysis of PFS, reporting, and diagnosis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Nov;42(8):1603-1627. doi: 10.1002/nau.25187.

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Medina Ninacóndor RP, Melgarejo Zevallos W, Medina Ninacondor PMN, Melgarejo Anamaría C, Huayanay Falconi L, Loza-Munarriz C, et al. Clinical and urodynamic characteristics of males with underactive bladder and bladder outlet obstruction . Rev Méd Hered [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Feb. 3];35(4):194-203. Available from: http://44.198.254.164/index.php/RMH/article/view/5273

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Most read articles by the same author(s)